|
Udder Health
Systems
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Udder Health SystemsModified Edwards Agar |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Excellent |
Complete Hemolysis |
| Staph. aureus |
Inhibited |
|
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Excellent |
Hemolytic negative |
| Strep. uberis |
Excellent |
Hemolytic variable |
| E- strep |
Excellent |
Hemolytic negative |
| Staph. species |
Inhibited |
|
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Fair |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Weak |
|
| Pasteurella |
Inhibited |
|
| Proteus |
Inhibited |
|
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
|
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
|
| Yeast |
Inhibited |
|
| Mold |
Inhibited |
|
| Nocardia |
Inhibited |
|
| Prototheca |
Inhibited |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Inhibited |

This selective agar is used at Udder Health Systems Laboratory for selection of all Staphylococci from bulk tank milk samples.
Culture Response
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Staph. aureus |
Excellent |
Yellow Hemolysin variable |
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Strep. uberis |
Inhibited |
|
| E- strep |
Weak |
Clear |
| Staph. species |
Excellent |
Yellow |
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Inhibited |
|
| Pasteurella |
Inhibited |
|
| Proteus |
Inhibited |
|
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
|
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
|
| Yeast |
Inhibited |
|
| Mold |
Inhibited |
|
| Nocardia |
Inhibited |
|
| Prototheca |
Inhibited |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Inhibited |

| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Excellent |
Camp Positive Esculin negative |
| Staph. aureus |
Excellent |
Hemolysin detection |
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Excellent |
Camp negative Esculin negative |
| Strep. uberis |
Excellent |
Camp variable Esculin positive |
| E- strep |
Excellent |
Camp Negative Esculin positive |
| Staph. species |
Excellent |
|
| E. Coli |
Excellent |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Excellent |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Excellent |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Excellent |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Excellent |
|
| Pasteurella |
Excellent |
|
| Proteus |
Excellent |
|
| Serratia |
Excellent |
|
| Bacillus |
Excellent |
|
| Yeast |
Excellent |
|
| Mold |
Excellent |
|
| Nocardia |
Excellent |
|
| Prototheca |
Excellent |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Excellent |
|
| C. bovis |
Excellent |

This is an indicator agar used at Udder Health Systems Laboratory for differentiating Streptococcus uberis from other E-streps in isolates from individual cow samples. The agar is also used as a selective agar in bedding samples for the isolation of Streptococcus uberis.
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Weak |
|
| Staph. aureus |
Inhibited |
|
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Excellent |
|
| Strep. uberis |
Excellent |
Yellow |
| E- strep |
Excellent |
|
| Staph. species |
Inhibited |
|
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Weak |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Inhibited |
|
| Pasteurella |
Inhibited |
|
| Proteus |
Inhibited |
|
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
|
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
|
| Yeast |
Inhibited |
|
| Mold |
Inhibited |
|
| Nocardia |
Inhibited |
|
| Prototheca |
Inhibited |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Inhibited |

Purpose
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Staph. aureus |
Inhibited |
|
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Strep. uberis |
Inhibited |
|
| E- strep |
Inhibited |
|
| Staph. species |
Inhibited |
|
| E. Coli |
Excellent |
Pink colonies |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Excellent |
Pink mucoid colonies |
| Klebsiella species |
Excellent |
Pink mucoid colonies |
| Pseudomonas species |
Excellent |
Colorless colonies |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Excellent |
Green/colorless colonies |
| Pasteurella |
No Growth |
|
| Proteus |
No Growth |
|
| Serratia |
Excellent |
Pinkish/red colonies* |
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
|
| Yeast |
No Growth |
|
| Mold |
Not Applicable |
|
| Nocardia |
Not Applicable |
|
| Prototheca |
Not Applicable |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Not Applicable |
*Note: Red color can be due to pigment production, not lactose fermentation.
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Excellent |
|
| Staph. aureus * |
Excellent |
Coagulation |
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Excellent |
|
| Strep. uberis |
Excellent |
|
| E- strep |
Excellent |
|
| Staph. species * |
Excellent |
|
| E. Coli † |
Excellent |
False Positive |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Excellent |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Excellent |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Excellent |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Excellent |
|
| Pasteurella |
Excellent |
|
| Proteus |
Excellent |
|
| Serratia |
Excellent |
|
| Bacillus |
Excellent |
|
| Yeast |
Excellent |
|
| Mold |
Excellent |
|
| Nocardia |
Excellent |
|
| Prototheca |
Excellent |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Excellent |
|
| C. bovis |
Excellent |
All of these organisms will grow in the coagulase broth, this growth will produce a cloudy appearance. This is not to be interpreted as a positive reaction, only the coagulation reaction is a positive result. The coagulation can be detected in as little as 4 hrs. Typically the reaction is still readable in 24 hrs. Some false negatives will occur when coagulation occurs but the clot will lyse again by 24 hrs.
* All Staph species will grow in the coagulase broth, but only Staph. aureus will generate a positive coagulation reaction. The coagulation can be detected in as little as 4 hrs. Typically the reaction is still readable in 24 hrs. Some false negatives will occur when coagulation occurs but the clot will lyse again by 24 hrs.
† Some strains of E. coli. can produce the coagulase reaction. A false positive result can occur if the analyst mistakenly tests an E. coli colony. It is the responsibility of the analyst to only perform this test only on Staphylococcus genus isolates.

Purpose
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Staph. aureus |
Inhibited |
|
| Mycoplasma |
Excellent |
Fried-Egg colonies |
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Inhibited |
|
| Strep. uberis |
Inhibited |
|
| E- strep |
Inhibited |
|
| Staph. species |
Inhibited |
|
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Inhibited |
|
| Pasteurella |
Inhibited |
|
| Proteus |
Inhibited |
|
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
|
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
|
| Yeast |
Inhibited |
|
| Mold |
Inhibited |
|
| Nocardia |
Inhibited |
|
| Prototheca |
Inhibited |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Inhibited |

Purpose
Updated: 1/6/05
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Excellent |
Esculin negative |
| Staph. aureus |
Excellent |
Hemolytic (beta) |
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
|
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Excellent |
Esculin variable |
| Strep. uberis |
Excellent |
Esculin positive |
| E- strep |
Excellent |
Esculin positive |
| Staph. species |
Excellent |
Hemolytic variable |
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Inhibited |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Inhibited |
|
| Pasteurella |
Fair |
|
| Proteus |
Inhibited |
|
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
|
| Bacillus |
Ínhbited |
|
| Yeast |
n/a |
|
| Mold |
n/a |
|
| Nocardia |
n/a |
|
| Prototheca |
Inhibited |
|
| Arcanobacterium pyogenes |
Excellent |
24-48 hour |
| C. bovis |
n/a |

Purpose
Updated: 1/6/05
| GP Agar |
MacConkey Agar |
|||
| Organism |
Growth |
Reaction |
Growth |
Reaction |
| Strep. agalactiae |
Growth |
Inhibited |
||
| Staph. aureus |
Growth |
hemolysis |
Inhibited |
|
| Mycoplasma |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
||
| Strep. dysgalactiae |
Growth |
Inhibited |
||
| Strep. uberis |
Growth |
Inhibited |
||
| E- strep |
Growth |
Inhibited |
||
| Staph. species |
Growth |
Hemolytic variable |
Inhibited |
|
| E. Coli |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Pink colonies |
|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Pink mucoid colonies |
|
| Klebsiella species |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Pink mucoid colonies |
|
| Pseudomonas species |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Colorless colonies |
|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Green/colorless colonies |
|
| Pasteurella |
Weak |
No Growth |
||
| Proteus |
Ínhibited |
No Growth |
||
| Serratia |
Inhibited |
Excellent |
Pinkish/red pigment |
|
| Bacillus |
Inhibited |
Inhibited |
||
| Yeast |
Not Applicable |
No Growth |
||
| Mold |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
||
| Nocardia |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
||
| Prototheca |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
||
| A. pyogenes |
Growth |
Small hemolytic |
Inhibited |
|
| C. bovis |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
||
A BULK TANK CULTURING PROGRAM FOR
MONITORING MILK QUALITY AND UDDER HEALTH
A. M. Britten1, and T. Emerson2
1Udder Health Systems, Inc.
Bellingham, Washington
2Darigold Farms
Seattle, Washington
A bulk tank culturing service has been available to producers of Darigold Farms in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and northern California since 19862. The goal of the culture is to identify the specific types of bacteria that make up the total raw bacteria count. It is a voluntary program and has grown in popularity over the years. At this point in time over 600 of the 1100 producers in the cooperative use this service each year.
Sample Procedure
The culture test is performed on a well mixed sample of bulk tank milk from the herd. Typically this sample is taken by the milk hauler and placed is a specially marked 4 oz. sample cup at the time of milk pick up. On some dairies the sample is pulled on a sporadic basis at the request of the producer. A large portion of the producers have arranged with the field personnel and the hauler for samples to be automatically taken each month. The samples are frozen and transported to the testing laboratory usually within 48 hrs.
Testing method
In the laboratory the sample is thawed and plated on four different solid media. Inoculums of .01 mls. of milk are plated onto a whole plate of washed cow blood agar, and a portion of mycoplasma agar and a selective strep. agar plates. Also inoculums of .1 mls. are plated onto portions of selective staph. agar plates. The non-selective washed cow blood agar is used for general identification and counting of a wide variety of bacteria groups. Bacteria are identified according to standard methods3.
The selective staph agar is similar in composition to the washed cow blood agar but has 7.5% sodium chloride added. Hemolytic staph colonies from this agar that are positive to the coagulase test are reported as Staph aureus. The selective strep agar is a modified Edwards4 media with added esculin, and Staph aureus beta hemolysin. Catalase negative, esculin negative colonies with CAMP like hemolytic zones around them are reported as Strep. ag. The selectivity of these media and the larger inoculum size allow us to attain greatly improved detection efficiency over the whole blood agar alone1. The mycoplasma agar is used as a screening test on all bulk tanks for organisms that will grow on this media. A separate fluorescent antibody test is recommended for confirmation of all mycoplasma like colonies grown on this media.
Results
A report is produced and mailed to the producer and the field personnel which shows the identification and total count of the various bacteria found in his bulk tank sample. With the aid of the fieldman and veterinary consultants, the producer can use the report as an aid in analyzing various milk quality and udder health problems in the herd. High somatic cell count tank milk by definition comes from herds with significant mastitis problems. The bulk tank culture can frequently reveal the likely pathogenic causes for these high cell counts. High bacteria counts in bulk tank milk may result from mastitic milk or from contamination, cleaning or cooling problems. On many occasions identifying the organism causing the high count may help guide the producer to more specific and appropriate correction efforts. When a major mastitis pathogen such as Strep ag. or Staph. aureus is causing a high bacteria count, we know disease control measures and abnormal milk diversion is the way to solve the problem. Conversely if organisms in the pseudomonas or bacillus group are too numerous then mastitis is probably not the culprit and attention should be turned toward environmental sanitation.
A special effort has been made to optimize the detection for the major mastitis pathogens Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycoplasma sp. Staph. aureus infection in herds is common and some producers just hope to keep the bulk tank counts for this pathogen low. Many progressive producers strive to keep the bulk tank counts for all three of these mastitis pathogens at zero. The table below shows pathogen detection statistics for a twelve month period ending in 1995.
Table 1. Pathogen Detection from Bulk Tank Culture Program
| Herds Positive |
% Herds Positive |
|
| Strep ag. |
31 |
5 |
| Staph aureus |
479 |
81 |
| Mycoplasma sp. |
34 |
6 |
| Total herds tested: |
589 |
1. Britten, A.M., 1996. Use of a selective agar for improving streptococcus agalactiae detection. Proc. 35 Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council.
2. Emerson, T., 1989. Bulk milk bacterial culturing - an aid to quality milk production. Proc. 28 Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, pp 49-53.
3. National Mastitis Council. Laboratory and Field Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Atkinson, WI: W.D. Hoard and Sons Co.
4. Schalm, O.W., Carrol, E.J., Jain, N.C., 1971. Bovine Mastitis. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger. pp 171-173.
USE OF A SELECTIVE AGAR FOR IMPROVING
STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE DETECTION
A. M. Britten
Udder Health Systems, Inc.
Bellingham, Washington
Streptococcus agalactiae is widely recognized as a very dangerous mastitis pathogen. Dairy managers rely on sensitive tests to detect this organism in prevention (bulk tank monitoring) and intervention (test and treat) programs. In bulk tank culture, because the sample is always a mixed culture, there is concern that the small Strep. ag. colonies may be missed because of competing bacteria. The common practice in herd culture procedures is to collect a single composite sample of the four quarters from each cow. This also leads to a situation where one is likely to obtain a mixed culture. Add to this the possibility of organisms from the skin contaminating the culture and again we have the concern that the Strep. ag. colonies may be missed. The use of selective streptococcus agar such as Edward’s2 media has been advocated as a means of aiding the diagnosis of Strep. ag. Two investigations are reported here evaluating the hypothesis that using a selective strep agar for detection of Strep ag. on bulk tank samples and on individual cow composite cultures would, improve detection over conventional blood agar.
Materials and Methods
The two media used for comparison are a washed cow blood agar plate with added esculin (BA) and a selective strep agar plate (E). The E agar is a modified Edward’s media with added esculin, and Staph aureus beta hemolysin. The 5074 bulk tank samples used in the study were submitted to the laboratory from 589 herds whose tanks were sampled from 1 to 57 times during a one year period. The 2120 individual cow composite samples tested in the study came from three herds with known Strep ag. histories.
For the bulk tank study, an inoculum of .01 mls. from a pipetter was placed onto a whole plate of BA, and onto half an E agar plate. The plates were incubated and read at 40-48 hours. For the individual cow composite samples a 3 mm platinum loop was used to streak the specimen onto a quarter section of the BA and E plates. These plates were incubated and read in 24 hours. The milk samples were incubated for 4-6 hours. For those specimens that had no growth at 24 hours, the plate was re-streaked with the incubated milk.
Streptococcus agalactiae identification was made according to standard methods1. From the BA plate non-esculin strep. candidates were selected for testing for CAMP reaction on a separate CAMP plate. From the E plate, catalase negative, esculin negative colonies with large hemolytic zones around them were selected for re-testing for CAMP reaction on a separate plate. The presence of at least a single CAMP positive colony resulted in that sample being reported as Strep. ag. positive.
Results
Of the 5074 bulk tank samples tested, 94 tanks tested positive for Strep. ag.when the E plate was used to detect the pathogen, versus only 43 tanks testing positive on the BA plate. (Table 1.). A similar increase in detection rate was seen when this data was analyzed by herd. Of the 589 herds tested, 31 herds tested positive for Strep. ag. on the E plates, versus only 15 on the BA plates (Table 2.). For the tank samples tested, the E plate always detected the Strep. ag. samples that were detected by the BA plate. An even more dramatic difference is seen on the composite cow samples tested (Table 3.). Of the 2120 composite samples tested, 220 tested positive for Strep. ag. on the E plates, versus only 49 on BA plates. On these samples the E plate detected all but three of the samples testing positive on the BA plate. Although the degree of difference for composite samples was strongly influenced by one herd, the difference was significant in all three herds. Although the incubation procedure increased the positive detection rates for both the E and BA plates it was only significant for the E plate.
Table 1. Test results for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae comparing a strep selective agar E versus washed cow blood agar BA from 5074 bulk tank samples.
| E+ |
E- |
Totals |
|
| BA+ |
43 |
0 |
43 |
| BA- |
51 |
4980 |
5031 |
| Totals |
94 |
4980 |
Table 2. Test results for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae comparing a strep selective agar E versus washed cow blood agar BA from samples shown in Table. 1. when analyzed by herd.
| E+ |
E- |
Totals |
|
| BA+ |
15 |
0 |
15 |
| BA- |
16 |
558 |
574 |
| Totals |
31 |
558 |
Table 3. Test results for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae comparing a strep selective agar E versus washed cow blood agar BA from 2120 cow composite samples from three problem herds.
| E+ |
E- |
Totals |
|
| BA+ |
46 |
3 |
49 |
| BA- |
174 |
1897 |
2071 |
| Totals |
220 |
1900 |
References
1. National Mastitis Council. Laboratory and Field Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Atkinson, WI: W.D. Hoard and Sons Co.
2. Schalm, O.W., Carrol, E.J., Jain, N.C., 1971. Bovine Mastitis. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger. pp 171-173.
Udder Health Systems Technical Report
Inulin Agar Evaluation Study
This study was conducted to test the Udder Health Systems Inulin Agar for its suitability in identification of Streptococcus uberis organisms from mastitis isolates. Inulin agar is a special formulation that contains two principal systems that are required to make this media useful for identification of Strep uberis and differentiating this species from other e-strep mastitis isolates in cow milk samples. There is an enrichment nutrient system in the agar that allows for the growth requirements of these streptococci. The agar uses the sugar inulin as the single source of carbohydrate. When organisms that ferment inulin are grown on the agar, there is an indicator system which shows a distinct yellowing of the agar to show that the organism has metabolized this sugar. Strep uberis is one of the streptococci that will ferment inulin. It is suggested by Udder Health Systems that this agar be used in a multi-step secondary screening procedure to identify this pathogen from cow milk samples. The test for inulin fermentation capability should only be done on esculin positive isolates from cow milk in the proposed scheme. In this scheme if an esculin positive cow milk isolate is Inulin Agar test positive (ferments inulin) then it is Strep uberis. The goal of the investigation was to estimate the sensitivity or specificity of this detection scheme. Sensitivity (the ability of the test to detect Strep uberis) was simply determined by comparing the number of isolates that were test positive to the total number of Strep uberis tested. The Specificity (the ability of the test to correctly identify non-strep uberis e-streps) was demonstrated by comparing the number of non-strep uberis organisms that were test negative to the total number of non-strep uberis tested.
The table below summarizes the data from the study in the form of a truth table.
| API RESULTS |
||||
| Strep. uberis |
Non- Strep uberis |
|||
| INULIN + |
93 |
8 |
101 |
|
| INULIN - |
6 |
95 |
101 |
|
| TOTAL |
99 |
103 |
202 |
|
| Sensitivity |
Specificity |
|||
| 94% |
92% |
|||
A total of 202 isolates of e-streps isolated from mastitic cow milk were included in the study. All the e- streps were speciated using the API rapid strep identification system. Of the 99 Strep uberis isolated tested, 93 of them were inulin test positive on this agar, resulting in a 94% Sensitivity. Of the 103 non-strep uberis organisms, 95 of them were test negative resulting in a 92% Specificity. In this study, the 8 organisms that were False Positive (inulin positive non-strep uberis) included 6 Strep bovis, 1 Ent faecium, 1 Aerococcus sp. The 6 False Negative organisms were by definition inulin negative Strep uberis.
Udder Health Systems Technical Report
2004 New Mycoplasma Agar Comparison Study
This study was conducted to assess the suitability of Udder Health System’s new ultra clear Mycoplasma agar in isolating mycoplasma organisms from bovine milk. The two agars in the study were the new ultra clear Mycoplasma agar plates manufactured by Udder Health Systems, Inc. Bellingham, Washington and the comparison mastitis mycoplasma agar plates manufactured by the University of California at Davis.
Mycoplasma isolation agar is a special formulation that contains two principal systems that are required to make this media useful for detection of mastitis causing mycoplasma from milk samples. There is an enrichment nutrient system, typically including serum, which allows for the special growth requirements of these fastidious, slow growing organisms. There are also inhibitor systems, which include antibiotics, to discourage non-mycoplasma growth. Typically non-target organisms may be present in individual cow milk samples and will always be present in bulk tank samples. To be successful in detecting mycoplasma organisms, these non-target species must be inhibited. If they do grow on the mycoplasma agar, they may overwhelm and obscure the mycoplasma growth and prevent their detection.
The goal of this study was to determine if there were any differences in the sensitivity or specificity of the two agars. Sensitivity (the ability to detect the mycoplasma in the specimen) was simply determined by comparing the organism counts based on plating the same specimen on a whole plate of each agar. The Specificity of the agar (the ability to only grow mycoplasma colonies and not grow competing bacteria) was demonstrated by the number of plates showing contaminating growth on each agar.
The following pages contain the raw data from the study. The samples used had been previously identified as containing mycoplasma, and had been stored frozen for up to one year before the study was initiated. Samples were identified by Sample number and Source (cow/tank). Each sample was plated in duplicate on UHS Media agar and UC Davis Media agar. The total number of mycoplasma colonies growing on each plate is shown in the column totals for each agar. It is clear from the raw data that the UHS Media is as sensitive or more sensitive than the UC Davis media is.
We also looked at natural contaminants that grew on the two agars from these field specimens. These are shown in the columns labeled Cont. In these data an advantage is shown in the inhibitor system in the UHS media, which we believe is particularly important for laboratories using a 10-day incubation (which UHS recommends). Contaminants showed in five of the UC Davis plates but only three of the UHS plates. Contaminant inhibition is important in selective agars like mycoplasma agar. Non-mycoplasma growth may interfere with the detection of low numbers of mycoplasma that may show up between day 5 and 10 of incubation.
Udder
Health Systems Inc.
6401 Old Guide Road
Bellingham, WA 98226
Copyright © 2009
UHS Inc. All rights reserved.